Literature involving health information in the dining halls was one part of my project but my bigger idea and change was in the Wiscard health account. There are many parts to the Wiscard account and my proposal may seem far-fetched but to me it’s a new way to gain information on health and lifestyle that may be absent in other changes to the university dining halls. Literature around the campus and other small changes to access of information in the university residence halls are part of the project I can do myself but I cannot do the Wiscard account. I will construct a plan and put its components together as I would like to see it in theory but resources and time does not allow me to make my project a reality.
Wiscard Account Plan and Idea
The Wiscard account is about collecting information on nutrition and lifestyle to be easily accessible to students through the swipe of their Wiscard; the University of Wisconsin- Madison student ID. Residence hall students at University of Wisconsin use their Wiscard to pay for the majority of the food they eat. This food is on students Wiscard. The idea of the Wiscard food account is to take count of food each student eats and nutritional information of this food to create an account of the food students consume.
With this students will have immediate access to nutritional information and the food they put in their body. By tying it to a student’s Wiscard, it makes it easier for students account to be managed and organized. Rather than providing a service where students would manually control it themselves a system related to their Wiscard will take out steps of the process. This solution stems from the idea of Professor Brander proposed in lecture; that if you want to change people’s behavior make what you want them to do easier.
Removing the step that students have to manage an account and total daily nutritional information on the food they consume will make it easier and for busy students to have access to information regarding their health. And as discussed (in previous post/paper) the more a student manages and has information regarding the food they consume, the more their behavior is likely to change for the better.
Making it easier for students to have this information could have an impact on the way they make decisions about food consumption. Hopefully changing this part of the food system at the university will create more demand on the purchase of healthy foods in the dining halls. As this demand for healthy food changes, as result healthier options would be more prevalent and diverse for students. Thus hopefully in the long run students will have both more information regarding nutrition consumption and more options of “healthy foods” in the halls themselves.
Though of course these are what ifs, things I cannot guarantee will be a result of the Wiscard account. There are many things that must turn out a certain way for this to happen. Mostly these things regard the way people approach the residence dining halls and if the existence of the account will change the way students act. Things that must go the right way include: students will be enthusiastic and use the Wiscard account, the information students receive on the Wiscard account will be persuasive enough to change their behavior, and other circumstances in the halls that don’t block decisions made in the dining halls (i.e. prices of healthy options are not too high).
How It Will Work
This proposed food account will have three main components: food, activity and information. There will be different ways to access the account: website, cell phone application, etc. The goal of the account is to make it easier for students to know and understand information regarding their health and nutrition. With that idea, I tried to create a model of the account that makes it easy to understand, easy to access, and easy to make changes based off of what is on it.
The first component is food. As a student buys food from their Wiscard, whether through their housing account or campus cash, the information of the food they bought would be uploaded to their health account. When a student wants to access the information or change information of the food they bought they will go to account and see nutritional information directly related to the food they bought and consumed. It will display how this food affects the body, showing reactions to a student’s behavior of choosing which food to eat.
The next component is activity. It will work similarly to the food, but be managed differently. It will total the activity a user does in a day, and total their activity of the day to see how it relates to their body and nutrition. For example, if a user runs three miles it will show how the running affected their body. This will be related to the food account, and display information on the best food to be paired with a student’s activity level. The account will demonstrate how decisions to be active, or lack thereof, affects a student’s overall health.
Information portion will be the final component. This will be tied to food and activity, as mentioned. Information on either ways to change food consumption for the better or activity will resemble a user’s account, dependent on their particular food and activities. For example if a student ate a fried chicken sandwich and French fries for lunch, this section will advise the user to perhaps try a grilled chicken sandwich and a salad, then demonstrate on the account how making this change would change the user’s daily nutrition and health. Displaying behaviors of students and consequences of their decisions and how changing such behaviors can change their health and lifestyle but impact their dining hall.
Though things will be updated automatically via the Wiscard, there will still be manual control on the account. Automatic function is set up to make it easier to read and access, under the idea that students are busy and are most likely not going to assert themselves to start a collection of food consumed. Being that automatic control is well automatic, allows for the account to be started free of hassle for the student; they just hop on board.
However because students eat and consume outside of their Wiscard, or buy things for other people on their Wiscard account, manual control will be a feature of the account as well. This will also be beneficial to students who do not live in the residence halls and still want access to an account where they can track their nutrition. Though that is to say, they will be working more to get the information than residences.
Automatic and manual control will be put in place so students can be sure to get the most out of the health account as possible, making information and data as accurate as possible to their consumption. If the account does not work to reflect their intake as best as possible then students may stray away from its use and ignore it all together. Going back to the idea of making it easiest for students to access information, but making sure information they receive is still accurate, that it’s useful for them to change their behavior. This after all is the overall intention of the Wiscard health account.
Resources
This project I propose entails the construction of a website and other media which I do not have the means to do myself. Therefor this project will need to enlist the help from various sources, if it were to be successful. Different circles on campus may be interested in this project as a stepping stone to one of their projects or an idea.
Those to help construct this idea include: fields in computer, University Health services, the nutrition department and the dining halls themselves. People in these fields cannot only help with the projects construction, but if it is not constructed can use the idea as a starting point for a future project. Either constructing and executing this idea or expanding or changing it to make it applicable to a project they want to do. However, other people than myself need to be enlisted for this project to be anything.
Struggles
I have outlined what I see my project doing and functioning at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, but other than that my project did not go anywhere. I don’t think it was successful. I only have a structure of an idea for my project. I have constructed a model in my head and have outlined some of it here but have not gone beyond. There are many roadblocks I ran into with the project and my two biggest struggles being: time and assertion, are why my project may not seem complete.
I do not want to make up excuses to why I think my project was not very successful but I would say time was a problem. As I talked about in my paper college students are busy and putting aside time to do things, even school work is difficult, and I am certainly not immune to this. I think if I have devoted more time and asserted myself more the project could have reached greater bounds.
Assertion was another one of my struggles. I was timid to putting myself out there and promoting, standing up for my project. I think this was my ultimate failure and why I see my project as unsuccessful. If I would have organized myself sooner and built up my project and went out to advocate for change in the system, maybe I would have seen a change. I think what stopped me the most was being afraid of failure, being shut down, not having things go the way I wanted. But the thing is, when you don’t try and do anything you still fail, but you just get to hide behind never trying, instead of vulnerability of putting yourself out there.
If I learned anything from this project it was that. It seems like a common sense; you don’t try you won’t succeed, but I guess I never experienced such circumstances before. So though the University of Wisconsin-Madison community has yet to gain anything from my project, I did. And I think I will use that to perhaps better another community in the future, and then I will take this lesson with me.
The “Why”
I think I wasn’t willing to try or fully put myself into this project because my “why” was not there. The Ted Talk, How Great Leaders Inspire Action by Simon Sinek, (http://www.ted.com/talks/simon_sinek_how_great_leaders_inspire_action.html) says the most important thing is “why” we do something not, “what” we do. When the project was assigned I didn’t have a “why.” I wasn’t invested in changing on the campus or world. My classmates were filled with whys and I was tied up in what to do; finding a topic I could change on campus not because I saw myself passionately invested in it but because I needed to do it for a class.
There are many things I would love to change or make better in the world, the problem is I don’t know which problem I am invested in solving yet. Not being invested or devoted to this project was the main reason for its failure. The only reason I had to succeed at this project was a grade. And I think that is the reason I was unable to succeed.
Final Statement
Overall I don’t think my project was successful. I think I have an alright idea on how to make a change to the dining halls for residence at University of Wisconsin-Madison. There are flaws to my project: the system I have in place not working, affects may not be vast, if put in place students not taking advantage of the account, but most of all my biggest flaw was myself in the project. This is a project to change “the world”, so why would I be important in it? If I am a person who is to make the change I believe I must have the outmost desire and passion, put myself fully into making this change happen. Unfortunately that was not the case with this project and my proposed change to better the university. That is why I think this project’s biggest flaw, besides a somewhat unclear and undeveloped model was I.
Sinek, Simon. “How Great Leaders Inspire Action.” Ted Talks. Video. Web. Sep. 2009.